(Continued)
Hagio:
Talking about strange space aliens, what was it, the one with the Earth occupied by several different kinds of space aliens. That humanoid one, what was it called…
Mizutama:
Sorry, it doesn't ring a bell.
Sakai:
Occupied?
Hagio:
There are plots and subplots, but you've got rock-shaped aliens, who make enormous efforts to move just one centimeter. In addition, Simak also features strange space aliens. But I actually don't like Simak's view of space aliens very much.
Sakai:
What don't you like?
Hagio:
Isn't it somewhat grotesque?
Sakai:
When it comes to space aliens you get two kinds. With one, the external shape may be human-like or not, but they think like humans. But there are people who depict aliens as something completely different from humans. Which kind do you like?
Hagio:
I like them both. But when Heinlein depicts a bad space alien, he tends to make it really grotesque, and I don't like it very much. There are cases where I would like to complain to the protagonist [author?] to think more about biology. When it comes to that, eh, that author who did "Ender's Game…"
Mizutama:
Isn't that Orson Scott Card?
Hagio:
I like his view of space aliens. So I am sorry, but I don't like the view of space aliens in "The Mote in God's Eye" by Niven and Pournelle, either. I don't know what to say, but once you create a character in life form, it's wrong not to have any sympathy toward it. The authors make them into massacre machines. Tezuka would never have done it that way, I think.
(Continues)
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
SF Online Interview with Hagio (Part IV-2)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment